Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Replying to The Social Observations Thread

Post Options

Enable emoticons?

Enter Your Name

Security Check *

[quote name='SertraOD' timestamp='1297385101' post='88881'] Being sexually liberated is beyond allowing yourself to be a horndog, just so you know. Real men and women aren't sex obsessed. Boys and girls are. Unfortunately, boys remain boys longer these days because of all the toxic, estrogenic shit out there... and girls are growing up faster and using sex as some kind of validation, never having the chance to truly grow in to a balanced, mature sexual being. I love discussing sex, but most people I talk to can't talk about it without objectifying the whole act. It's ridiculous. There's so much more to it than that and not in that lovey dovey save yourself kind of way. Most people don't even bother with classic seduction, preferring to go for the fastest lay. I make 'em melt. Oh yes, melt like butter. And that's so much manlier than saying "I'D SLAM HER LOL". [/quote]

or Cancel

Topic Summary

Punk Rock Geek

Posted 22 November 2012 - 06:05 PM

Skaz, on 03 September 2012 - 10:12 AM, said:

This was an interesting thread, it's a shame got forgotten about.

Lately I've been pondering about friendship. I wonder how many of the relationships I consider to be friendships are actually worthy of the name. I have a 'friend' who I've known since we were 5 (over two decades ago) and he makes no effort to meet up with me or our other mutual friends. One of these friends is moving to Scotland soon and had a leaving do in a pub and this guy couldn't be bothered to call in for a drink even though he was passing the pub. I understand that friends drift apart but I know that in the future he'll want to be friends again.
...

EatShitAndCry

Posted 22 November 2012 - 05:28 PM

Fathers are the worst.

All Dead

Posted 22 November 2012 - 05:02 PM

EatShitAndCry, on 22 November 2012 - 04:23 PM, said:

The problem, Skaz, is clearly that your friend is a fucking cop.

Having a(n) (ex-) cop for a father isn't easy.

EatShitAndCry

Posted 22 November 2012 - 04:23 PM

The problem, Skaz, is clearly that your friend is a fucking cop.

Floyd

Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:17 AM

Topic locked to keep out the spam. Unlock it to post.

Skaz

Posted 03 September 2012 - 10:12 AM

We've debated about the law and stuff in the past but hi...

Black Cat

Posted 04 October 2011 - 04:21 PM

Punk Rock Geek, on 04 October 2011 - 04:07 PM, said:

For many people, being committed does equal being exclusive. You are correct though, I don't consider them synonymous and was just curious about how you were using them here. I would consider myself very committed to the people I care about, but I use the word to signify emotional commitment in general and avoid the association with romance entirely. So, I would also say that people should be honest about their willingness/unwillingness to commit, but if they wish not to, that it's not necessarily a result of low self esteem or emotional baggage.

Not necessarily, yeah.

Punk Rock Geek

Posted 04 October 2011 - 04:07 PM

Black Cat, on 04 October 2011 - 03:50 PM, said:

It confuses me, too. Emotions cannot always be put into black or white categories and sometimes we are just ambivalent, aren't we?

Also, weren't you argueing against those, who accuse free lovers of not being able to commit to a person? Because they would be the ones, who leave a partner for a new partner sooner or later, whereas a free lover would be more able to continue an already existing relationship when encountering a new one. Correct me if I got that wrong. And being committed doesn't equal being exclu...

Black Cat

Posted 04 October 2011 - 03:50 PM

Punk Rock Geek, on 04 October 2011 - 03:26 PM, said:

I know this is old, but I just noticed it. It kind of confuses me because you were arguing for free love in the other topic.

It confuses me, too. Emotions cannot always be put into black or white categories and sometimes we are just ambivalent, aren't we?

Punk Rock Geek

Posted 04 October 2011 - 03:26 PM

Black Cat, on 14 June 2011 - 02:50 PM, said:

If people cannot handle even the slightest bit of commitment to another person because of their low self esteem or emotional baggage or whatever they should have at least the decency to put the blame on themselves.

I know this is old, but I just noticed it. It kind of confuses me because you were arguing for free love in the other topic.

Review the complete topic (launches new window)

Replying to The Social Observations Thread

Post Options

Topic Summary

Sign In