Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/index.php:2) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 110

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/index.php:2) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 127

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/index.php:2) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 136

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/index.php:2) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 137

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/index.php:2) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 141
Replying To dog walk gone bad - The People United

Jump to content


Replying to dog walk gone bad


Post Options

  or Cancel


Topic Summary

Steve

Posted 19 February 2010 - 08:23 PM

Kick more dogs off of bridges!

RancidPunk

Posted 19 February 2010 - 06:26 PM

Awwww, what the fuck.   Let's have some more fun with it.

BUMP!

Alex

Posted 10 December 2009 - 01:01 AM

View PostPunk Rock Geek, on 09 December 2009 - 07:58 PM, said:

This is not what I asked for.  Your statement was that:

"this whole of idea of imprisoning people clearly doesn't work. it creates a breeding ground for criminals and does nothing to change their behavior"

I could give you all types of rehabilitation methods with less than positive results, but it would say nothing about the effectiveness of rehabilitation as a whole.  Yes, the prison system needs to be reformed significantly.  But a murderer who has deep mental/emotional issues should not be allowed to walk around unrestricted, under any circumstances. The reasons for this are obvious,...

SertraOD

Posted 10 December 2009 - 12:49 AM

FlaccidJunk's from the ghetto? LOL

Punk Rock Geek

Posted 09 December 2009 - 07:58 PM

View PostAlex, on 09 December 2009 - 05:32 PM, said:

just one i found quickly im sure they are more stats to back this up

http://www.ojp.usdoj.../recidivism.htm
This is not what I asked for.  Your statement was that:

"this whole of idea of imprisoning people clearly doesn't work. it creates a breeding ground for criminals and does nothing to change their behavior"

I could give you all types of rehabilitation methods with less than positive results, but it would say nothing about the effectiveness of rehabilitation as a whole. ...

Steve

Posted 09 December 2009 - 06:28 PM

View PostRancidPunk, on 09 December 2009 - 06:16 PM, said:

I was just pointing out how my feelings on animal abuse are related to your feelings on criminal rehabilitation.   Instead of making light of animal abuse, look at it and how it is related to the person in general.
WHAT THE FUCK

This is what we have been saying the entire time you fucking dork. Jesus Christ you're such a misanthrope it's not even funny. You want to look at the causes of people being cruel to animals, but you just want to lock up every person that murders or rapes without looking at it?

No one has made light of animal abuse, and all of us have said that animal abuse is "wrong...

Fightin_da_Man

Posted 09 December 2009 - 06:20 PM

View PostRancidPunk, on 09 December 2009 - 06:16 PM, said:

I was just pointing out how my feelings on animal abuse are related to your feelings on criminal rehabilitation.   Instead of making light of animal abuse, look at it and how it is related to the person in general.

Sounds to me like you're trying to defend an animal abuser.

Or are you suggesting that we try to rehabilitate him after we throw him off a bridge?

RancidPunk

Posted 09 December 2009 - 06:16 PM

View PostFightin_da_Man, on 09 December 2009 - 06:06 PM, said:

When did you switch sides in this debate?
I was just pointing out how my feelings on animal abuse are related to your feelings on criminal rehabilitation.   Instead of making light of animal abuse, look at it and how it is related to the person in general.

Fightin_da_Man

Posted 09 December 2009 - 06:06 PM

View PostRancidPunk, on 09 December 2009 - 06:01 PM, said:

No, we shouldn't do that.  But if you want to know why people commit crimes and attempt to rehabilitate them, this would be the perfect place to start.   Whenever someone abuses and tortures animals, that would be the time to get involved.   Maybe you could 'save them' from becoming the next Dahmer.

When did you switch sides in this debate?

James

Posted 09 December 2009 - 06:03 PM

View PostSkaz, on 09 December 2009 - 05:58 PM, said:

He didn't say he wants to destroy him, just that he should be punished for his crime. The law at present is woefully inadequate at punishing people who are cruel to animals. I think a combination of punishment (a fine and maybe some community service) as well as councelling would be appropriate for that case.
He was making a connection, saying that if I want to destroy power I should want to destroy this guy. He was trying to point out a flaw in my argument, and failed in doing so.

Review the complete topic (launches new window)