Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/conf_global.php:1) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 110

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/conf_global.php:1) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 127

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/conf_global.php:1) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 136

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/conf_global.php:1) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 137

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/conf_global.php:1) in /home/antiflag/anti-flag.com/forum/admin/sources/classes/output/formats/html/htmlOutput.php on line 141
What are your opinions on Ron Paul? - Politics & Protests - The People United

Jump to content


What are your opinions on Ron Paul?


33 replies to this topic

#1 rg37

rg37

    Confused Youth

  • Confused Youth
  • Pip
  • 13 posts

Posted 22 September 2011 - 10:54 AM

I have researched Free Market Economics and find a lot of good in their arguments. I also find a lot of good with what he says. Though I'm not a hundred percent sure how I feel about supporting capitalism, I do believe he would be a step in the right direction for this country. What do you think about him and his views? And can you give me the reason collectivists economics are better than Free Market? I would lover to hear what you have to say about the matter. I am a very open minded person and I like to go where the evidence is strongest.

#2 EatShitAndCry

EatShitAndCry

    Anti-Violent

  • Anti-Violent
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 522 posts

Posted 22 September 2011 - 01:54 PM

Fuck him. I hope he wins, though, just out of morbid curiosity.

#3 Punk Rock Geek

Punk Rock Geek

    Challenge Conventional Thinking

  • Administrators
  • 3,893 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 22 September 2011 - 03:56 PM

View PostEatShitAndCry, on 22 September 2011 - 01:54 PM, said:

Fuck him. I hope he wins, though, just out of morbid curiosity.
He's considering adding Kucinich as his secretary of defence (or, this case, peace).  I would vote for him if he went through with that.

And if I was American.
I'm PRG/Poofah, and I ran http://peacepunk.net for nearly 5 years before being promoted to the official Anti-Flag website. It's nice to meet you all! I will be administering this forum alongside Anti-Flag and the A-F Records crew.

#4 Vandevick

Vandevick

    Teenage Kennedy

  • Teenage Kennedy
  • PipPip
  • 69 posts
  • Location:horrid NV

Posted 22 September 2011 - 07:35 PM

while i agree with Ron Paul on his views on ending the wars and legalizing drugs, I would not vote for him
due to his sponsoring a bill to end Roe vs. Wade, he is very much against a woman's right to choose, including
in the cases of rape and incest, he wants to end both social security and medicaid, apparently only the rich
have the right to medical help and retirement, he is scary uber-religious wanting to curtail separation of church
and state and his comments about how the civil rights act of 1964 diminished civil liberties and his opposition
to anti-discrimination legislation makes me wonder where he stands on the rights of minorities. While he does have
some views I agree with I am just not comfortable with his many views that I consider too bigoted and conservative.
come to the dark side...we have cookies!

#5 YQS

YQS

    Captain Anarchy

  • Captain Anarchy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 239 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 22 September 2011 - 08:52 PM

I like his views on foreign policy... but like Vandevick said, his domestic policies are too conservative. Still, I'm not American, so I don't have to weight the costs and benefits of voting for him. I would love it if he were in power and got the US to stop bombing my people...

#6 Guest_Kelsey newton_*

Guest_Kelsey newton_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 October 2011 - 07:02 AM

View PostVandevick, on 22 September 2011 - 07:35 PM, said:

while i agree with Ron Paul on his views on ending the wars and legalizing drugs, I would not vote for him
due to his sponsoring a bill to end Roe vs. Wade, he is very much against a woman's right to choose, including
in the cases of rape and incest, he wants to end both social security and medicaid, apparently only the rich
have the right to medical help and retirement, he is scary uber-religious wanting to curtail separation of church
and state and his comments about how the civil rights act of 1964 diminished civil liberties and his opposition
to anti-discrimination legislation makes me wonder where he stands on the rights of minorities. While he does have
some views I agree with I am just not comfortable with his many views that I consider too bigoted and conservative.


#7 Guest_Kelsey newton_*

Guest_Kelsey newton_*
  • Guests

Posted 12 October 2011 - 07:05 AM

Actually, Ron Paul personally is against abortion but would ultimately leave the decision up to individual states. He simply wants to  overturn the federal policy of Roe vs. Wade so that a state has the option to make abortion illegal if that's how their people voted.

#8 rg37

rg37

    Confused Youth

  • Confused Youth
  • Pip
  • 13 posts

Posted 16 October 2011 - 08:29 PM

Thing is, people hear "End Medicaid" and stuff and think he's trying to protect the rich. But if you learn about Austrian Economics and Free Markets you'll learn that it only helps the poor have greater access to these things. http://www.therightp...on-in-cuts-and- Also, I found this to be quite a cool thing.

#9 EatShitAndCry

EatShitAndCry

    Anti-Violent

  • Anti-Violent
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 522 posts

Posted 16 October 2011 - 08:32 PM

There is no reason to support RP if you're not a capitalist. End of story.

#10 AtomicGarden

AtomicGarden

    Corporate Whore

  • Corporate Whore
  • 2 posts
  • Location:Earth. or so it seems.....

Posted 24 October 2011 - 02:48 AM

OK his views abortion are harsh and irrational but i can understand why he feels that way on abortion based on the fact that before becoming involved in politics he was a practicing OB/GYN doctor so yeah that's reasonable, but the main thing that stands out for me is his policy on national defense. we have been at war on two different fronts. well "officially" declared war in Afghanistan, and illegally at war in Iraq for the last decade and fighting both wars has sent us into a fiasco financially. So instead of fighting useless battles costing the deaths of thousands of lives (not just Americans, but Iraqi's, Kurds, etc)and stopping illegal wiretapping that goes against the Constitution, and the ideals of our Forefathers founded America on. He will instead focus on legitimate issues. Plus he's willing to end nation building in other country's that our draining us dry financially, and fix things here at home instead of having us become hated, hypocritical global police as Bush and Obama have done. Plus he's pro 2nd Amendment, and that's a good thing in my book based on how civilization as a whole is turning more violent with every passing day.

#11 Black Cat

Black Cat

    Anti-Violent

  • Anti-Violent
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 600 posts

Posted 24 October 2011 - 12:23 PM

He's honestly against a woman's right to choose an abortion in case of rape?

Can you Americans please stop considering to vote crazy people into office? You're scaring me.  :P

Please correct me if I'm wrong.


View PostAtomicGarden, on 24 October 2011 - 02:48 AM, said:

OK his views abortion are harsh and irrational but i can understand why he feels that way on abortion based on the fact that before becoming involved in politics he was a practicing OB/GYN doctor so yeah that's reasonable, but the main thing that stands out for me is his policy on national defense. we have been at war on two different fronts. well "officially" declared war in Afghanistan, and illegally at war in Iraq for the last decade and fighting both wars has sent us into a fiasco financially. So instead of fighting useless battles costing the deaths of thousands of lives (not just Americans, but Iraqi's, Kurds, etc)and stopping illegal wiretapping that goes against the Constitution, and the ideals of our Forefathers founded America on. He will instead focus on legitimate issues. Plus he's willing to end nation building in other country's that our draining us dry financially, and fix things here at home instead of having us become hated, hypocritical global police as Bush and Obama have done. Plus he's pro 2nd Amendment, and that's a good thing in my book based on how civilization as a whole is turning more violent with every passing day.
I was gonna say:"Why should the fact, that he was a practicing Gyn, explain an anti-choice stance"? Shouldn't this make him pro-choice actually, because he would care for his patients well-being? But then I realized that it's mostly the doctors in an emergency room, who have to deal with women dying from an infection and other injuries they got from a back alley abortion, and probably not the trained gynecologist who refused to do the procedure.

#12 EatShitAndCry

EatShitAndCry

    Anti-Violent

  • Anti-Violent
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 522 posts

Posted 24 October 2011 - 02:27 PM

View PostEatShitAndCry, on 16 October 2011 - 08:32 PM, said:

There is no reason to support RP if you're not a capitalist. End of story.


#13 tuerdesflics

tuerdesflics

    Corporate Whore

  • Corporate Whore
  • 2 posts
  • Location:fuck this city, california

Posted 24 March 2012 - 07:13 PM

Anonymous has exposed Ron Paul with links to white supremists, there is also a video of him giving a pretty skewded version of the civil war in front of a confederate flag.  enough said.
promise me that you'll never stop rockin' there are cops to kill and banks to be robbin'

#14 Guest_Casey Aldridge_*

Guest_Casey Aldridge_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:24 PM

I feel Ron Paul is was too deregulatory. On wars and illegal substances I agree with him, but anyone who wants to give more power and less oversight to corporations and  Wall St. is not of or for the 99%.  Our environment, unions, public employees, and poor would be devastated by Paul's policies.

Also, he really is a white, male, Christian supremacist, which I could never support as a white, male, Christian liberal who is tired of being misrepresented.

#15 Guest_Casey Aldridge_*

Guest_Casey Aldridge_*
  • Guests

Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:26 PM

I feel Ron Paul is was too deregulatory. On wars and illegal substances I agree with him, but anyone who wants to give more power and less oversight to corporations and  Wall St. is not of or for the 99%.  Our environment, unions, public employees, and poor would be devastated by Paul's policies.

Also, he really is a white, male, Christian supremacist, which I could never support as a white, male, Christian liberal who is tired of being misrepresented.

#16 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 April 2012 - 07:32 PM

He is too conservative but he is definitely better than the other candidates. I like that he seems to be really against the wars. He is by far the smartest out of the bunch.

#17 Guest_RUCKUS_*

Guest_RUCKUS_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:57 PM

RON PAUL IS A THREAT TO THE STATUS QUO, WHICH IS A GOOD THING! IT'S PRETTY CRAZY, WHEN WE HAVE A SHITTY PRESIDENT IN OFFICE EVERYONE SAYS "THERE TAKIN AWAY OUR FREEDOM" "END THE WAR" AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THEN WHEN YOU GET A CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR OFFICE THAT IS ALL ABOUT FREEDOM AND AGAINST WAR THOSE SAME PEOPLE TALK BAD ABOUT HIM. IT'S RIDICULOUS. RON PAUL IS NOT ABOUT BEING REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT. HE'S ABOUT BEING FREE. PEOPLE SHOULD HELP OTHERS, THAT'S WHY LIBERAL BELIEFS CAN BE VERY GOOD. BUT IT SHOULDN'T BE IN THE GOVERNMENTS HANDS TO FORCE EVERYONE TO, IT SHOULD BE THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE. SOMEONE WHO WOULD CALL THEMSELVES ANARCHIST THAT WOULD VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT RON PAUL THIS YEAR PROBABLY NEEDS TO DO SOME MORE RESEARCH. RON PAUL 2012 REVOLUTION!

#18 Guest_RUCKUS_*

Guest_RUCKUS_*
  • Guests

Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:59 PM

RON PAUL IS A THREAT TO THE STATUS QUO, WHICH IS A GOOD THING! IT'S PRETTY CRAZY, WHEN WE HAVE A SHITTY PRESIDENT IN OFFICE EVERYONE SAYS "THERE TAKIN AWAY OUR FREEDOM" "END THE WAR" AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THEN WHEN YOU GET A CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR OFFICE THAT IS ALL ABOUT FREEDOM AND AGAINST WAR THOSE SAME PEOPLE TALK BAD ABOUT HIM. IT'S RIDICULOUS. RON PAUL IS NOT ABOUT BEING REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT. HE'S ABOUT BEING FREE. PEOPLE SHOULD HELP OTHERS, THAT'S WHY LIBERAL BELIEFS CAN BE VERY GOOD. BUT IT SHOULDN'T BE IN THE GOVERNMENTS HANDS TO FORCE EVERYONE TO, IT SHOULD BE THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE. SOMEONE WHO WOULD CALL THEMSELVES ANARCHIST THAT WOULD VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT RON PAUL THIS YEAR PROBABLY NEEDS TO DO SOME MORE RESEARCH. RON PAUL 2012 REVOLUTION!

#19 EatShitAndCry

EatShitAndCry

    Anti-Violent

  • Anti-Violent
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 522 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 06:26 PM

"I'm an anarchist, I'm gonna vote for Ron Paul!"

#20 EatShitAndCry

EatShitAndCry

    Anti-Violent

  • Anti-Violent
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 522 posts

Posted 04 June 2012 - 06:28 PM

Seriously though, what kind of fucking anarchist votes at all? It's completely counter-intuitive to the philosophy of anarchism.

All politicians are scum, because they seek power over other people.

Oh, and RuPaul > Ron Paul.



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users