So where does everyone here stand politically?
#1
Posted 13 December 2010 - 01:55 PM
So what made everyone where get into politics since most of our generation is more into themselves than society or politics? And is anyone involved in any groups or looking to?
-Chris
member of the Boston branch of Socialist Alternative
http://www.facebook....id=473499380525
#2
Posted 13 December 2010 - 02:22 PM
Economic Left/Right: -8.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.05
"It's possible to be a patriot without being a bigot, just as it's possible to be a weather forecaster without being a stripper, but if a weather forecaster took her clothes off halfway through a forecast, its fair to say the striptease element of her performance would greatly overshadow any meteorological merit." - Charlie Brooker
#3
Posted 13 December 2010 - 05:40 PM
#5
Posted 13 December 2010 - 06:20 PM
#11
#14
Posted 14 December 2010 - 11:13 PM
I believe in taking each issue in itself and dealing with it. For example, I'm pro-choice, so I want abortion to be legal, I want women to have access to it, ideally for free or at minimal costs. But I don't see the abortion issue as part of a wider struggle for feminism, or a defeat of religious morality's control over society, or part of an ideology of population control, even though I like all those things and see them as positive byproducts of the issue, but really it is just the issue in itself that matters.
I'm a leftist in general, I believe things like running water, electricity, and housing are basic human rights. I am pro-environment, and want clean and infinitely renewable energy, but I'm not an anarcho-primitivist, I find anarcho-primitivism to be a ridiculous ideology, I am absolutely pro-technology.
I think reform or direct action can be acceptable, and it depends on the situation what to do. I support Wikileaks because I know it isn't possible to vote away government deception, but I think voting is important and do believe in choosing the lesser of many evils, and then fighting against them when that time comes.
#15
Posted 15 December 2010 - 09:56 AM
one day I decided to really listen to the lyrics of bands I liked and I discovered what allot of songs meant
#16
Posted 15 December 2010 - 03:27 PM
John, on 14 December 2010 - 11:13 PM, said:
I believe in taking each issue in itself and dealing with it. For example, I'm pro-choice, so I want abortion to be legal, I want women to have access to it, ideally for free or at minimal costs. But I don't see the abortion issue as part of a wider struggle for feminism, or a defeat of religious morality's control over society, or part of an ideology of population control, even though I like all those things and see them as positive byproducts of the issue, but really it is just the issue in itself that matters.
I'm a leftist in general, I believe things like running water, electricity, and housing are basic human rights. I am pro-environment, and want clean and infinitely renewable energy, but I'm not an anarcho-primitivist, I find anarcho-primitivism to be a ridiculous ideology, I am absolutely pro-technology.
I think reform or direct action can be acceptable, and it depends on the situation what to do. I support Wikileaks because I know it isn't possible to vote away government deception, but I think voting is important and do believe in choosing the lesser of many evils, and then fighting against them when that time comes.
I totally agree with your opinion.
But I think anarchy would be great but not possible...
they Stand for greed, they stand for hate, for nothing i believe..."
#17
Posted 15 December 2010 - 03:50 PM
John, on 14 December 2010 - 11:13 PM, said:
I believe in taking each issue in itself and dealing with it. For example, I'm pro-choice, so I want abortion to be legal, I want women to have access to it, ideally for free or at minimal costs. But I don't see the abortion issue as part of a wider struggle for feminism, or a defeat of religious morality's control over society, or part of an ideology of population control, even though I like all those things and see them as positive byproducts of the issue, but really it is just the issue in itself that matters.
I'm a leftist in general, I believe things like running water, electricity, and housing are basic human rights. I am pro-environment, and want clean and infinitely renewable energy, but I'm not an anarcho-primitivist, I find anarcho-primitivism to be a ridiculous ideology, I am absolutely pro-technology.
I think reform or direct action can be acceptable, and it depends on the situation what to do. I support Wikileaks because I know it isn't possible to vote away government deception, but I think voting is important and do believe in choosing the lesser of many evils, and then fighting against them when that time comes.

“Well, people got attatched. Once you cut the umbilical cord they attatched to the other things. Sight, sound, sex, money, mirages, mothers, masturbation, murder, and Monday morning hangovers.”
#18
Posted 18 December 2010 - 07:52 AM
woutree, on 15 December 2010 - 03:27 PM, said:
But I think anarchy would be great but not possible...
I too. I believe in anarchy, I want it. But it is unfortunately rather impossible. Therefore I allow power, but only well done, exercise. But I do not see this anywhere.
#19
Posted 20 December 2010 - 07:53 PM
But seriously, I'm just a right wing cell on here to see what all you goofballs think is profound and "morally just" so I can give myself a jump start to devise rhetoric to deteriorate any notion you have on anarchism and pass it off as teen angst.
Edited by The Real Nick, 20 December 2010 - 07:53 PM.
#20
Posted 20 December 2010 - 08:18 PM
There is no civilization without civilizing, no capitalization without us capitalizing and capitulating.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















